It was with great concern that I read the article “City to consider selling Riverbend par 3 course” (Kent Reporter, May 31).
During times of economic hardship it is important to examine budgets and make cuts
that are, at times, unpopular. However, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits of this particular asset very carefully. As mentioned, the Riverbend par 3 is an important asset for both the seniors and youth of Kent, amongst others.
I am concerned to hear that the potential sale of taxpayer funded properties is being discussed at private council retreats with public meetings “at dates to be determined.” Further, it is disturbing that Mr. Watling, a city employee, is talking about the sale of a taxpayer-owned property, and feels comfortable discussing it as if it were already a done deal. As a city employee, and not an elected member of the council, Mr. Watling has no more authority to comment on any proposed sale than I.
Based on the details available in the article, it appears the parks director has been made privy to some private information that the rest of us have not.
Concerned citizens of Kent should question why the City Council is discussing the sale of valuable public property with city employees, and at private retreats, rather than in open council meetings. At the very least the details in this article raise the unpleasant specter of impropriety.
– Robert Allred
Talk to us
Please share your story tips by emailing editor@kentreporter.com.
To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.kentreporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.
