Surplus ordinance raises questions

The city of Kent's new surplus ordinance prepared for City Council approval on May 17 looks nothing like the tired and proven city of Renton's 2004 surplus policy and procedure, a comparison City Attorney Tom Brubaker said was the best example for the operations committee to reference as the city tries to recover from the $800,000 Pine Tree Park debacle.

The city of Kent’s new surplus ordinance prepared for City Council approval on May 17 looks nothing like the tired and proven city of Renton’s 2004 surplus policy and procedure, a comparison City Attorney Tom Brubaker said was the best example for the operations committee to reference as the city tries to recover from the $800,000 Pine Tree Park debacle.

Our surplus ordinance does not require a recent appraisal to set value. There is no competitive process to market for highest bid, but it continues to allow our Economic Community Development Department the ability to sell selectively to whomever they want at whatever price. Rest assured, the council gives final approval for sales agreements, like Pine Tree Park.

We will not get a public “hearing” before surplus, but what our city staff call a much more flexible public “meeting.” This meeting notice is 15 days before they sell the property. A “hearing” in Renton is 60 days before they can declare the property surplus and always must be published.

The original draft outline did not require any published notice in the local newspaper, but Council President Bill Boyce pressured to add one notice of the meeting in the Kent Reporter. Our 15-day notice could result in a day between a meeting and a sold sign.

There is no language for where surplus proceeds go. In Renton, if they sell park land, they have a no net-loss park land policy that reinvests proceeds so park land in not diminished. In Kent, they could sell park land and spend it on anything.

In Kent, without a surplus ordinance, our parcels declared surplus in the past by staff have been sold in executive session under property negotiations, a clear misuse of the executive session.

The first test for this “flexible” surplus ordinance, which the council now has on its other business for the 17th, will be the surplus of the 7-acre downtown Naden property, a past city RV park.

I’ve been told the Naden proceeds will go toward parks improvement. More net loss for park land, more freedom for city staff to choose how our treasury is spent with council’s approval.

– Sandi Lynden


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@kentreporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.kentreporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.

More in Letters to the Editor

Email editor@kentreporter.com
For every vote to count, Kent needs district-based elections | Guest column

By Mónica Mendoza-Castrejón Guest Column If you’re a community member here in… Continue reading

Email editor@kentreporter.com
Letters: Support King County Charter Amendment

Support King County Charter Amendment As a lifelong resident of King County,… Continue reading

Messes in Mill Creek Canyon

Thank you for your very informative article (“Cleaning up Mill Creek Canyon… Continue reading

Priced out of our homes

Priced out of our homes In the middle of everything that is… Continue reading

Kent School Board addresses death of George Floyd

The recent death of Mr. George Floyd at the hands of a… Continue reading

Some good advice in the fight against infection

School closings, sports event cancellations, food hoarding. … We live in a… Continue reading

City should focus on the real problem, a health crisis

It is time for the city officials of Kent to stop their… Continue reading

How much effect will virus have?

The situation regarding King County’s acquisition of the Econo Lodge in Kent… Continue reading

Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city
Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city

Like many Kent residents, I was blindsided when I heard, late Wednesday… Continue reading